Legal Opinion

Miller v. Bode

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1923No. 11,476PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDausman, J.

The procedure adopted in this matter is so irregular and confusing that it should not go unnoticed.

The proceeding is not a civil action, and therefore the provisions of the Code are not applicable. Brownlee, Admr., v. Hare (1878), 64 Ind. 311; Conger v. Babcock, Admr. (1882), 87 Ind. 497; Dohle v. Stultz, Admr. (1884), 92 Ind. 540.

The proper method of challenging the correctness of an administrator’s account, as exhibited in his report, is to file objections (sometimes inaptly called exceptions) thereto, specifically pointing out the alleged errors. §2913 Burns 1914, Acts 1883 p. 160;…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Yale v. West Middle School DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  2. Brownlee v. HareIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Swift v. HarleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Warren v. HoferIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Woodward v. WoodwardTennessee Supreme Court · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Meier v. Union Trust Co., Exr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. State Ex Rel. Crawford v. Howard Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Croxton, Administratrix v. CroxtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. State Ex Rel. Hurd v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API