Loftin v. . Kornegay
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.
We deem it unnecessary to discuss the provisions of the alleged oral agreement under which the plaintiffs seek to establish a parol trust in their favor against the widow and heirs at law of Prince Kornegay. Whatever the agreement might have been, the record discloses that after it was entered into, the plaintiffs executed and delivered to Prince Kornegay a deed with full covenants and warranties, for the land in controversy. A parol agreement in favor of a grantor, entered into at the time of or prior to the execution of a deed, and at variance with the written conveyance is unenforceable in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gaylord v. GaylordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Gaylord v. . GaylordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Perry v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Hare v. . WeilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Ricks v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Willetts v. WillettsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Humphrey v. FaisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- McCullen v. DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- McCullen v. . DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Lamm v. CrumplerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.