Legal Opinion

Zabinski v. Novak

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

An order of a trial court granting a new trial is not to be disturbed unless there has been an abuse of judicial discretion, or the order, being one made as a matter of right, has resulted from an erroneous view of the law. Crombie v. Powers, 200 Wis. 299, 227 N. W. 278; Mellor v. Heggaton, 205 Wis. 42, 236 N. W. 558; Sickle v. Wolf, 91 Wis. 396, 64 N. W. 1028; Fontaine v. Fontaine, 205 Wis. 570, 238 N. W. 410. The order under consideration was granted on the motion of respondent because the court below concluded that, in connection with questions in the special verdict which concerned the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Osborne v. MontgomeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Fontaine v. FontaineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Crombie v. PowersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Mellor v. HeggatonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Sickle v. WolfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Langdon v. Loup River Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Bennett v. Larsen Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Quam Ex Rel. Quam v. WengertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Hessman v. State Board of ControlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API