Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Clarkson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 28, 1929No. 18934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. A sale or transfer of a stock of goods, wares, or merchandise may amount to a fraud, under the bulk-sales act of 1903 (Civil Code of 1910, §§ 3226-3229), although only a part of the stock be sold, where the sale is “out of the usual or ordinary course of the business or trade of the vendor.” Where a person engaged in the business of “selling Reo automobiles” maintains his principal office and place of business in one city and maintains a branch office and place of business in another city, and at the latter place keeps a stock of goods, wares, and merchandise, consisting of second-hand…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jaques & Tinsley Co. v. Carstarphen Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Charles v. Valdosta Foundry & Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Keller v. Fowler Bros. & CoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Weller v. Davis & Sanford Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chattanooga Discount Corporation v. WestDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1963
  2. Cohen v. CalhounMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Sproul v. GamboneDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Black v. Albany Bowling Supplies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API