Legal Opinion

Bauman v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1965No. Calendar 56, Docket 50,367Published

1Opinion of the Court

376 Mich. 675 (1965)

138 N.W.2d 285

BAUMAN

v.

GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY.

Calendar No. 56, Docket No. 50,367.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided December 7, 1965.

Rehearing denied January 5, 1966.

Kelly, Kelly & Kelly (Phillip C. Kelly, of counsel), for plaintiff.

McKone, Badgley, Domke & Kline (Maxwell F. Badgley, of counsel), for defendant.

SMITH, J.

This time in this case, the chief question for review concerns jury instructions. Other facets of the case are contained in 2 prior reports.[1] Essentially, the facts are that a collision occurred in the early afternoon of April 20, 1956, at a…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Guggenheim v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Hogsett v. EllisMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Staal v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API