Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 19, 1985Published

1ConcurrenceEllerin, J.

I concur in the result here only because further delaying these proceedings would merely serve to impede the ability of the nonappealing injured passenger to finally obtain a recovery, hereby frustrating the very purposes for which the ameliorative provisions of the Insurance Law were enacted.

I would note, however, that were the injured passenger, Rodriguez, the appellant herein, I could not find that Criterion’s disclaimer "based upon lack of notice of this occurrence” is valid as to him. The uncontradicted facts in this somewhat sparse record show that the only notice of disclaimer from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hartford Insurance v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. General Accident Insurance Group v. CirucciNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Allstate Insurance v. GrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Lauritano v. American Fidelity Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  5. Lauritano v. American Fidelity Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API