Legal Opinion

Heard v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 15, 1932No. 22357PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeoyles, C. J.

1. “It is well settled by repeated and numerous decisions of the Supreme Court and this court that the striking of a defendant’s plea is not a final judgment in the case, and that a direct bill of exceptions complaining of such a judgment only will not lie. The striking of a plea of former jeopardy comes within this rule.” Giles v. State, 34 Ga. App. 201 (129 S. E. 12) ; English v. Rosenkrantz, 150 Ga. 745 (105 S. E. 292).

2. The bill of exceptions in the instant ease recites that “the defendant, at the proper time, before arraignment and before pleading to the merits of the second indictment,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. English v. RosenkrantzSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  2. Giles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Blackwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API