Legal Opinion

Wildearth Guardians v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service

District Court, D. Utah

Decided April 22, 2009No. 2:07-cr-00837PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER AFFIRMING AGENCY DECISION

CLARK WADDOUPS, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

In this action, Plaintiffs 1 challenge two permits issued by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (the “Service”) under the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”). The permits authorize Cedar- City, Utah and the Paiute Indian Tribe to live trap and relocate Utah Prairie Dogs that are damaging the Cedar City municipal golf course and adjacent lands owned by the Paiute Tribe. The Utah Prairie Dog is a “threatened” 2 species under the ESA. It is unlawful to “take” members of this species due to its…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Colorado Environmental Coalition v. DombeckCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  2. Aragon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. Utah Environmental Congress v. TroyerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  4. Lewis v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. National Wildlife Federation v. NortonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rocky Mountain Wild v. DallasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
  2. Union Neighbors United, Inc. v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API