In re Cullinan

There is no question that the violations of the

Liquor Tax Law were permitted at the place designated for the •sale of liquors in this certificate, and it appears that the business was conducted ostensibly under such certificate. The contention •of the respondent is, however, that the business was not his business, nor was he connected in any way with the violations. This may be the fact, but still he cannot resist the cancellation of the •certificate for the violations proven, nor escape the incidental liability for costs. As the holder of the certificate “ he is the principal whom the law…