Legal Opinion

Pinelli v. DIST. CT. IN & FOR 18TH JUD. DIST.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 21, 1979No. 79SA5PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rovira

Dave and Phil Pinelli (petitioners) instituted this original proceeding under C.A.R. 21, and we issued a rule for the respondents to show cause why the criminal action now pending against the petitioners should not be dismissed. We now discharge the rule and remand the cause to the district court for further proceedings.

On April 7, 1978, separate state grand jury indictments were filed in Jefferson County and Arapahoe County charging the petitioners with conspiracy to commit professional gambling in violation of section 18-2-201, C.R.S. 1973 (now in 1978 Repl. Vol. 8). The petitioners pled…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Carr v. District Court in & for Eighth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  3. Rowse v. DISTRICT COURT IN & FOR COUNTY OF ALAMOSASupreme Court of Colorado · 1972

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mason v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. People v. BellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. Hampton v. DIST. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF JEFFERSONSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  4. People v. SanchezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  5. People v. RunningbearSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API