Dary v. Grau
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.
[After the foregoing statement of the case.] The contention of the appellants in the first appeal is that unless the gift over to “ my surviving sons or daughters ” is to be . construed to mean sons and daughters who survive the testatrix, there is an intestacy in the event which has happened, namely, the surviving life tenant’s dying without leaving issue. But in our opinion this gift over to surviving sons and daughters is a *486gift to the sons and daughters who survived the several life tenants as they respectively deceased, and that in the event now before us there is no intestacy.
Where…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jackson v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Dexter v. InchesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Hall v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
- Stone v. BradleeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Lawrence v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
3Cited by9 opinions
- Clarke v. FayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Sanger v. BourkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Savela v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Second Bank-State Street Trust Co. v. Second Bank-State Street Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
- Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. NevinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.