Legal Opinion
Ferguson v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 21, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2020-3395Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANDRE FERGUSON Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-3395 (CKK) WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (September 21, 2022) Plaintiff Andre Ferguson (“Plaintiff”) brings this employment discrimination action against Defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“Defendant” or “WMATA”). Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint raises three claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964: (1) racial discrimination; (2) hostile work environment based on race; and (3) retaliation based on engaging…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.