State v. Tellez
Court of Appeals of Texas
1ConcurrenceYanez, Justice
I concur as to the majority’s disposition of this case but for different reasons. The record in this ease, even if incomplete, allows us to dispose of various points of error and at least begin a speedy trial analysis.
By its first point of error, the State alleges the trial court erred in dismissing its cause of *335action against Tellez without the consent of the prosecution. The show cause order, the State argues, instructed the State to show why the cause should not be dismissed for want of prosecution, but it is well-settled that a Texas court does not have the authority to dismiss a case for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hull v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.