Legal Opinion

Trumbull v. School District No. 7

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1900No. 3565PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Clallam County. — Hon. James G-. McClintost, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered hy

White, J.

-Respondent commenced this cause in the court helow to recover from appellant damages in the sum of $1,305, for breach of contract to teach the schools for school years 1896-7 and 1897-8. Appellant’s defense consisted of two affirmative defenses, to-wit: First, that respondent had during the life of the contract sought and obtained other like employment; second, that when the contract was made and broken, and during its entire life, appellant had reached its limit of indebtedness. The case was tried before a jury. At the close of the testimony…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bleecker v. Satsop RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lines v. Yakima School District No. 7.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  2. Ferguson v. HoshiWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Kirby v. Rainier-Grand Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Gorham-Revere Rubber Co. v. Broadway Automobile Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Van Dyke v. School District Number 77Washington Supreme Court · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API