Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 5, 1941No. A-9776PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

The defendant, W. G. Smith, was jointly charged with Roy Hatfield and Roy Smiley by information on December 2, 1988, with cutting and injuring timber; was tried, convicted, and fined $25, from which judgment and conviction he appeals to this court.

The only contention made by the defendant is that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for a new trial for the reason the evidence was not sufficient to' support the verdict.

The prosecuting witness identified the defendant as being one of the men whom he saw cut timber from an unfenced tract on certain land owned by him. The defendant was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Romans v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  2. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  3. Branch v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Colbert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. State v. GilliganSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burris v. Burris (In re Burris)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API