Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh v. Insurance Commissioner

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1971No. Appeals, Nos. 911 Tr. Dkt. 1970 and 912 Tr. Dkt. 1970PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Manderino,

This case involves an appeal by the City of Pittsburgh (City) and the County of Allegheny. (County) from a decision of George F. Reed, the Insurance Commissioner of Pennsylvania, approving a rate increase requested by Blue Cross of Western Pennsylvania (Blue Cross). On April 3, 1969, Blue Cross filed with the Insurance Department a request for a rate increase for its subscribers in twenty-nine counties in western Pennsylvania, including residents of the City of Pittsburgh and Allegheny County. The requested increase was publicly announced, as was the fact that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. City of Pittsburgh v. Milk Marketing Board of CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Newport Homes, Inc. v. KassabCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. New Hampshire-Vermont Physician Service v. DurkinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Pittsburgh v. Insurance DepartmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. ALMY v. Borough of WilkinsburgCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API