Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 9, 2009No. Nos. 07-2071-cv(L), 07-2286-cv(XAP), 07-2290-cv(CON), 07-5710-cv(CON), 08-2334-cv(CON)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”) appeals several decisions of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Laura Taylor Swain, /.), which, inter alia, found that MetLife’s decision to deny Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant Rachel Cohen’s application for long term disability (“LTD”) benefits based on an alleged “Pre-Existing Condition” was arbitrary and capricious. In this action, brought pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), the District Court granted summary…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Goldie Miller, as of the Estate of Sarah M. Potok v. United Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  3. Stephen King v. Allied Vision, Ltd. And Innovation Books, a Division of the Innovation Corporation, New Line Cinema CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. Arthur Chambless and Mildred H. Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  5. McCauley v. First Unum Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tatas v. Ali Baba's Terrace, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API