Legal Opinion

Drew v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided May 20, 1958No. Docket No. 60189Published

Taxpayer was principal and income beneficiary of a trust which terminated in 1947. At that time there remained unpaid certain commissions earned by the trustee-bank which were by the terms of the trust deductible from corpus before distribution to the beneficiary. The trustee-bank postponed collection of the commissions as an inducement to the beneficiary's leaving the corpus under the management of the bank as an agency account.

Read the full summary

Taxpayer was principal and income beneficiary of a trust which terminated in 1947. At that time there remained unpaid certain commissions earned by the trustee-bank which were by the terms of the trust deductible from corpus before distribution to the beneficiary. The trustee-bank postponed collection of the commissions as an inducement to the beneficiary's leaving the corpus under the management of the bank as an agency account. The bank retained the right to collect the commissions from the investments at the termination of the agency. In 1953 the agency was terminated and the beneficiary…

1Opinion of the Court

Estate of James B. Drew, Deceased, John Drew, Executor, and the Estate of Mary S. Drew, Deceased, Henry Phipps Hoffstot, Jr., Executor, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Drew v. Commissioner

Docket No. 60189

United States Tax Court

30 T.C. 335; 1958 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 189;

May 20, 1958, Filed

Decision will be entered for the respondent.

Taxpayer was principal and income beneficiary of a trust which terminated in 1947. At that time there remained unpaid certain commissions earned by the trustee-bank which were by the terms of the trust deductible from corpus before…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Drew v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API