Fitzgerald v. Van Buskirk
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Davis
The plaintiff, Homer Fitzgerald, brought this suit against the defendants, James and Sonja Van Buskirk, to foreclose a mechanic’s lien against certain property owned by them. The trial court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that it did not state a cause of action.
The plaintiff contends that his complaint was sufficient to state a cause of action under the Mechanics’ Liens Act (Ill Rev Stats 1967, c 82, par 1, et seq.). The complaint alleged that on October 1, 1965, the plaintiff and the defendants entered into an oral contract under which the plaintiff…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United Retail, Wholesale & Department Store Employees of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
- Kita v. YMCA of Metropolitan ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
- Suddarth v. RosenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
- Fanning v. LemayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
- Hall v. GruesenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Adams v. J. I. Case Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1970
- Coffey v. MacKayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- Norman A. Koglin Associates v. Valenz Oro, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Malkov Lumber Co. v. Serafine Builders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1971
- Mitchell v. Toledo, Peoria & Western RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.