Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Van Buskirk

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 22, 1968No. Gen. 67-164PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Davis

The plaintiff, Homer Fitzgerald, brought this suit against the defendants, James and Sonja Van Buskirk, to foreclose a mechanic’s lien against certain property owned by them. The trial court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that it did not state a cause of action.

The plaintiff contends that his complaint was sufficient to state a cause of action under the Mechanics’ Liens Act (Ill Rev Stats 1967, c 82, par 1, et seq.). The complaint alleged that on October 1, 1965, the plaintiff and the defendants entered into an oral contract under which the plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United Retail, Wholesale & Department Store Employees of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Kita v. YMCA of Metropolitan ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  3. Suddarth v. RosenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  4. Fanning v. LemayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  5. Hall v. GruesenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Adams v. J. I. Case Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  2. Coffey v. MacKayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  3. Norman A. Koglin Associates v. Valenz Oro, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Malkov Lumber Co. v. Serafine Builders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  5. Mitchell v. Toledo, Peoria & Western RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API