Legal Opinion

Cox v. Sellers

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided November 9, 1942PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Vice-Chancellor :

The trustees seek instructions whether they should distribute to the life beneficiaries, or retain as trust corpus, all or part of certain monies received by them from the liquidation of a corporation of which they held preferred and common stock. The monies in question represent the amount of dividends on the preferred stock which were accrued and unpaid at the time .of liquidation, and which were paid out of the capital of the corporation. The life beneficiaries contend that the entire amount should be paid to them; while the other respondents, to whom I shall refer as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Penington v. Commonwealth Hotel Construction Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1931
  2. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Bryan v. AikinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1913
  4. Penington v. Commonwealth Hotel Construction Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1930
  5. Fisher's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  2. Cox v. SellersCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API