Legal Opinion

Matisoff v. Dobi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Friedman, J.), entered March 10, 1995, which, inter alia, awarded plaintiff 40% of defendant’s enhanced earning potential and counsel fees and declined to enforce the parties’ postnuptial agreement, unanimously affirmed.

The appealed judgment deemed the parties’ marital property subject to the equitable distribution provisions of the Domestic Relations Law (Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B]). The parties had, however, entered into a postnuptial agreement pursuant to which they disavowed “any right, title or claim in and to the real and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. DeCabrera v. Cabrera-RoseteNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. McSparron v. McSparronNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Matisoff v. DobiNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Matisoff v. DobiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API