Legal Opinion

Estate of Armstrong v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided October 29, 2002No. 1118-98Published

In 1991 and 1992, D gave stock to Cs and other donees. For gift tax purposes, D valued the stock at $ 100 per share. As a condition of receiving certain of these gifts, Cs agreed to pay additional gift taxes arising if the gifts of stock were later determined to have a fair market value greater than $ 100 per share. In 1993, D died.

Read the full summary

In 1991 and 1992, D gave stock to Cs and other donees. For gift tax purposes, D valued the stock at $ 100 per share. As a condition of receiving certain of these gifts, Cs agreed to pay additional gift taxes arising if the gifts of stock were later determined to have a fair market value greater than $ 100 per share. In 1993, D died. Subsequently, R determined that D's gifts of stock should be valued at $ 109 per share, resulting in gift tax deficiencies which were paid by a trust that D had established. The total gift taxes paid on D's 1991 and 1992 gifts of stock were $ 4,680,284. Cs paid…

1Opinion of the Court

ESTATE OF FRANK ARMSTRONG, JR., DECEASED, FRANK ARMSTRONG III, EXECUTOR, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Estate of Armstrong v. Comm'r

No. 1118-98

United States Tax Court

119 T.C. 220; 2002 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 50; 119 T.C. No. 13;

October 29, 2002, Filed

Respondent's motion for partial summary judgment granted.

In 1991 and 1992, D gave stock to Cs and other donees. For gift

tax purposes, D valued the stock at $ 100 per share. As a

condition of receiving certain of these gifts, Cs agreed to pay

additional gift taxes arising if the gifts of stock were later

determined to have a…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API