Legal Opinion

Fox v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 10, 1989No. 88-1046PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Judge.

Appellant Randy Lamonte Fox appeals from his convictions for four counts of armed robbery, armed burglary, armed sexual battery, possession of cannabis and resisting an officer, and the sentences imposed therefor. We affirm in part and reverse in part and remand.

The first point raised by appellant requires this court to once again apply the harmless error test set forth in State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986), and approved in State v. Lee, 531 So.2d 133 (Fla.1988). The specific error complained of concerns the lower court’s ruling on appellant’s motion to sever the charge…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. State v. VazquezSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  3. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  4. Rease v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  5. Marek v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Monson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Sigaray v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API