Legal Opinion
State ex rel. W. E. Dooley & Co. v. Superior Court
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 25, 1924No. 18378PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
This is an original application made to this court for a writ of prohibition.
The facts, as we gather them from the record, are in substance these: The Seattle Electrical Supply Company is a corporation organized under the laws of this state. Prior to July 23, 1923, it was a going concern engaged in the electric supply business in the city of Seattle. Long prior to the date named, it acquired, and now owns certain real property situated in the city of Seattle. On February 24, 1922, it mortgaged this property to the Penn Mutual Insurance Company to secure a loan made to it by that company. On…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- First National Bank v. William R. Trigg Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1907
- First Nat. Bank of Cleveland v. SheddSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Pilliod v. Angola Railway & Power Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1910
- Cherry & Parkes v. Western Washington Industrial Exposition Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895
- State ex rel. Krisch v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cramer v. Wildwood Development Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Park National Bank v. Cattani, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State Ex Rel. Austin v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Huntington National Bank v. Motel 4 BAPS, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State Ex Rel. Avenius v. TidballWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.