Legal Opinion

State v. Contreras

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided September 11, 2026No. 127830Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 127,830 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. JORGE PONCE CONTRERAS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S. Ct. 2348,

147 L. Ed. 2d 435

(2000), requires that "[o]ther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt." 2. State v. Nunez, 319 Kan. 351, 354,

554 P.3d 656

(2024), did not change Kansas law regarding Apprendi. 3. State v. Nunez, 319 Kan. 351, 354,

554 P.3d 656

(20…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. State v. GouldSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API