Legal Opinion

Celardo v. Bell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 18, 1995PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant third-party plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Brien, J.), dated September 9, 1993, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for *548summary judgment and the third-party defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the third-party complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion and the cross motion are denied.

It is axiomatic that summary judgment is a drastic remedy which should only be granted if it is clear that no material issues of fact have been presented. Issue finding, rather…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Museums at Stony Brook v. Village of Patchogue Fire DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Community National Bank & Trust Co. v. McClammyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dykeman v. HehtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Bankers Trust Co. of California, N. A. v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Fourtounis v. MJB Service Station, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Gray v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Brown v. CocaNew York Supreme Court · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API