Celardo v. Bell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant third-party plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Brien, J.), dated September 9, 1993, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for *548summary judgment and the third-party defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the third-party complaint.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion and the cross motion are denied.
It is axiomatic that summary judgment is a drastic remedy which should only be granted if it is clear that no material issues of fact have been presented. Issue finding, rather…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Museums at Stony Brook v. Village of Patchogue Fire DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Community National Bank & Trust Co. v. McClammyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dykeman v. HehtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Bankers Trust Co. of California, N. A. v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Fourtounis v. MJB Service Station, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2009
- Gray v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2010
- Brown v. CocaNew York Supreme Court · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.