Legal Opinion

City of Williamston v. Wheatfield Township

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 8, 1985No. Docket 77553PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal from the circuit court’s ruling that, pursuant to the home rule cities act, 1 approval of a detachment petition by a majority of those voting is sufficient for detachment. We conclude that the home rule cities act is plain on its face and that construction of that act is unnecessary.

On December 23, 1978, by order of the State Boundary Commission, an area consisting of approximately one square mile of land was detached from Wheatfield Township and annexed to the City of Williamston. On July 13, 1983, residents of the annexed area filed a detachment petition with the Ingham…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Certified QuestionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Salas v. ClementsMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Hiltz v. Phil's Quality MarketMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Owendale-Gagetown School District v. State Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Metropolitan Council No 23 v. Oakland County ProsecutorMichigan Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Providence Hospital v. National Labor Union Health & Welfare FundMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Gillette Commercial Operations North America & Subsidiaries v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Casco Township v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Morgan v. Taylor School DistrictMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API