Garrett v. Rahily & Martin
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Court of Law and Chancery of the city of Norfolk in an action of detinue. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant assigns error.
1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, J.
W. F. Garrett, defendant, complains of an adverse judgment entered in favor of Daniel Rahily and James R. Martin, partners, trading as Rahily & Martin, plaintiffs, in an action of detinue for a Jackson touring automobile.
The pertinent facts are, that the plaintiffs, who lived in Petersburg, were the general agents of the Jackson Motor Corporation, of Jackson, Mich., land on or about the 16th of March, 1920, appointed one L. N. Crawford, an automobile dealer in Norfolk, Va., their subagent for the sale of such automobiles. This agency contract required Crawford to purchase the machines…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Boice v. Finance & Guaranty Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1920
- O'Neil v. CheatwoodSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
3Cited by6 opinions
- General Credit, Inc. v. Winchester, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1955
- Welebir v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- McQuay v. MOUNT VERNON BANK AND TRUST COMPANYSupreme Court of Virginia · 1959
- McQuay v. Mount Vernon Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1959
- General Credit, Inc. v. Winchester, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.