Legal Opinion

City of Philadelphia v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1864PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to tbe'District Court for the city and county of Philadelphia. ■ This was an action of assumpsit, brought to recover a sum of money alleged to be due to the plaintiff in the court below, for her salary as .a teacher in the Girls’ High and Normal School of the city of Philadelphia. The plaintiff below obtained a verdict for $261.83, on which the court entered judgment.

Read the full summary

Error to tbe'District Court for the city and county of Philadelphia. ■ This was an action of assumpsit, brought to recover a sum of money alleged to be due to the plaintiff in the court below, for her salary as .a teacher in the Girls’ High and Normal School of the city of Philadelphia. The plaintiff below obtained a verdict for $261.83, on which the court entered judgment. A Normal School for the instruction of girls had been established by the Controllers of Public Schools. Its chief object was to supply teachers for the grammar schools for girls in the county of Philadelphia, and none were…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Woodward, J.

From an examination of the Acts of Assembly, to which our attention has been directed in this case, it is apparent that everything pertaining to the public schools, within the city and county of Philadelphia, has been committed to the Board of Controllers, excepting only the public purse, which has been kept carefully in the-hands of the City Councils. The Controllers have power to establish schools, to provide school-books, to make rules and regulations for the conduct of the schools, to appoint teachers, and to fix their salaries, but…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rosenblit v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  2. Board of Public Education v. RansleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API