Legal Opinion
Cofield v. Ala. Public Service Commission
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 22, 1991No. 89-7787PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Circuit Judge:
This case arises as a result of the district court’s sua sponte dismissal with prejudice of all of Sir Keenan Cofield’s present suits and its order requiring Cofield to pay full filing fees and seek prefiling approval of any complaints or papers filed by Cofield in the future.
I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE
A. Background Facts
Cofield is an overly litigious fellow. Among the many suits he has brought from his jail cell are suits against both McDonald’s and Burger King for using pork fat in the oil used to fry french fried potatoes, thereby poisoning his body, mind and soul. He…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cofield v. Ala. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991