City Finance Co. v. Baldwin
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.
Complaining against defendants in a plea of trespass on the case, plaintiff’s declaration alleges that defendants Baldwin and Harpool were copartners engaged in the used car business, that defendant Bartig was their employee, that the partners caused Bartig to execute a conditional *176sales contract, for the purchase of a car, containing representations, relied upon by plaintiff in its purchase of the contract from the partners, which were false in that the partners had not actually sold a car to Bartig nor had he made a down payment thereon as represented in the instrument, and that the serial…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Keating v. HicksMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chromacolour Labs, Inc. v. Snider Bros. Property Management, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Klimmer v. KlimmerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Worth v. DortmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979