Legal Opinion

City Finance Co. v. Baldwin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1949No. Docket No. 21, Calendar No. 44,517PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

Complaining against defendants in a plea of trespass on the case, plaintiff’s declaration alleges that defendants Baldwin and Harpool were copartners engaged in the used car business, that defendant Bartig was their employee, that the partners caused Bartig to execute a conditional *176sales contract, for the purchase of a car, containing representations, relied upon by plaintiff in its purchase of the contract from the partners, which were false in that the partners had not actually sold a car to Bartig nor had he made a down payment thereon as represented in the instrument, and that the serial…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Keating v. HicksMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chromacolour Labs, Inc. v. Snider Bros. Property Management, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Klimmer v. KlimmerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Worth v. DortmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API