Legal Opinion

The Short Cut

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 17, 1881PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Admiralty. Sur Exceptions to the Commissioner’s Deport Distributing Proceeds of Sale.

1Opinion of the Court

Acheson, D. J.

The exceptant, B. H. Palmer, Jr., claims to be paid, out of the proceeds of the sale of the steam-ferryboat Shortcut, $288, “for his services as clerk,” from March 2 to June 23, 1880, and $204.88, the balance of his wages as master, from June 23 to October 6, 1880.

The evidence, however, shows that the exceptant was not a clerk of the boat in any proper 'sense of that, term. During the period covered by that part of his claim the boat was in course of construction. She was built for and owned by the Six-Mile Ferry Company, a corporation. The hull was built under contract by S. P.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. The LottawannaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Sanger v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The Ripon CityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1900
  2. Nelson v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
  3. The ElseDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1928
  4. White v. The M. M. MorrillDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API