Legal Opinion

Young v. Robertson

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 2, 2015No. CV-15-418PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBart F. Virden, Judge

hOn September. 25, 2014, appellants Teresa Young and,James Carson filed a complaint to establish an easement by prescription, necessity, or adverse use over land owned by appellees Elmer Robertson, Jack Burgess, and Autumn Burgess. Appellants alleged that they .were landlocked in that there was no direct access and no reasonable means to access their property without use of an existing fifty-foot ingress-and-egress easement. The Lonoke County Circuit Court dismissed appellants’ complaint. On appeal, appellants argue that the trial court erred in finding insuffi-dent evidence to establish an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. PappSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Sanford v. SanfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Attaway v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Horton v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  5. Berry v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whitecotton v. OwenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  2. Carthel Jackson Hodges Sr. Revocable Trust v. Gravel Hill Cemetery Comm.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  3. Arkansas County Bank, Dewitt v. Pin Oak Hunting Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API