Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Dennison

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 8, 1982No. 80-8-99, CA 18904Published

1Dissent

VAN HOOMISSEN,

dissenting.

The record in this case satisfies me that on the afternoon defendant appeared in circuit court he had not the foggiest notion why he was there or what was happening to him. Under the circumstances, defendant was denied procedural due process. Floyd v. Motor Vehicles Div., 27 Or App 41, 44, 554 P2d 1024, rev den 276 Or 873 (1976).1 I *945would therefore vacate the trial court’s order and remand for further proceedings.

Defendant appeared in court without counsel. What transpired thereafter speaks for itself:

“THE COURT: State of Oregon, plaintiff, versus Gregory Lewis…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Floyd v. Motor Vehicles DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API