Legal Opinion
United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, Inc. v. Metropolitan Human Relations Commission
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 23, 1994No. 93-1739PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAY, Circuit Judge.
Richard P. Kesterke (“Kesterke”) filed a complaint with the Metropolitan Human Relations Commission of the City of Fort Wayne, Indiana (“Metro”), claiming that United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, Inc. (“Farm Bureau”) refused to renew his homeowner’s insurance policy because he lived in a racially mixed neighborhood. Pursuant to the contractual relationship between Metro, which is a local civil rights agency, and the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), Kesterke was able to file through Metro a complaint under the Fort Wayne fair…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lehman Brothers v. ScheinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Gossmeyer v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- James R. Sullivan v. James P. Conway and International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Conrad Associates v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1998
- Gossmeyer v. McdonaldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- In the Matter of the Application of County Collector of the County of Winnebago, Illinois, Appeal of Michael F. O'brien, Alice J. O'brien, Edward M. MaherCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.