Legal Opinion
Smith v. Lincoln Brass Works, Inc.
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided June 9, 1986PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
This action for benefits and damages under the Workers’ Compensation Act was dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, pursuant to T.R.C.P., Rule 12.02(6).
The pertinent averments of the complaint are:
That this is a proceeding under and by virtue of the Workers’ Compensation Laws ,.. for benefits as provided in Section 50-6-101 et seq. of the Tennessee Code Annotated.
That on or about March and April, 1985, while employed in the course and scope of her employment as a machine operator, the Plaintiff sustained various emotional injuries as a result of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cornpropst v. SloanTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Fuerst v. Methodist Hospital SouthTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
- Pemberton v. American Distilled Spirits Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- Swallows v. Western Elec. Co., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1976
- Jose v. Equifax, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Webb v. Nashville Area Habitat for Humanity, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- Dobbs v. GuentherCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
- SNPCO, INC. v. City of Jefferson CityTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Baines v. Wilson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.