Legal Opinion

Cummins v. Kennedy

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 15, 1823PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Writ oferror oña judgment of the General CourL Statement ■’he caso.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court.

Charles Cummins and William Kennedy, op the 25th of April 1783, agreed to exchange lands. Cummins bound himself to convey to Kennedy four hundred acres of land in the then district of Kentucky, in the county of idncoln, on the waters of Harrod’s creek; and Kennedy bound himself to convey to Cummins eight hundred acres of land, of equal quality, on the waters of Lickt ing, on the south side of the stream. Cummins obtained, by virtue of his pre-emption warrant, only two hup-*119tired and forty-eight acres and one quarter of land, instead of the four hundred acres contemplated…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Greenby v. WilcocksNew York Supreme Court · 1806
  2. Kent v. WelchNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  3. Delano v. JoplingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1822

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thomas v. BlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
  2. Joyner v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Linde v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. Pence v. GabbertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Young v. TriplettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1824

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API