Ward v. Farrelly
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Thayer, J. Rev. Stats-., sect. 3547 ; Brown v. Kimmel, 67 Mo. 430 ; Lee v. Abrams, 12 111. 118; Bishop v. Baldwin, ;14 Yt. 145; s. c. 17 Yt. 470; Baxter v. Thompson, 26 Yt. 559 ; Bond v. Bank, 2 Ga. 92. Shepard v. Bank, 15 Mo. 144; Powell v. Railroad Co., 65 Mo. 658; Brown v. Kimmel, 67 Mo. 430.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, P. J.
The plaintiffs are husband and wife, and so are the *371defendants. This is a suit for partition of real estate belonging to the wives. The answer alleges receipts of reilts, etc., by the plaintiffs, and prays for an accounting. The plaintiffs’ reply, raises certain issues relating to receipts and disbursements, and alleges, among other matters, that at various times they “ have had accountings with her, [the defendant wife] and settlements.” At the hearing before a referee, it appeared that the plaintiffs had generally managed the property since April, 1874, and that on September 4, 1877, they…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Emery v. . PeaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
3Cited by5 opinions
- Newberger v. FriedeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
- Nelson v. DiffenderfferMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
- Patillo v. Allen-West Commission Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Kent v. HighleymanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
- Samuel C. Davis & Co. v. StrawnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898