Legal Opinion

Davis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 8, 1899No. 2062PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Ho statement necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDS OH, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of a viola-. tion of the Sunday law. His motion for new trial was overruled on May 18th, and an order allowing ten days after adjournment of court in which to prepare statement of facts was entered upon the minutes. Court adjourned on May 20th. On May 24th or 25th appellant presented to the county attorney his prepared statement of facts, which it is stated covered about three pages of written matter. The county attorney failed to agree with appellant’s counsel on said statement, and for one reason or another delayed preparing a statement,…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Haak v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API