Legal Opinion

Freese v. Swartchild

United States Circuit Court

Decided May 28, 1888PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Bills for infringement of patent, brought by Bernard Freese against Samuel Swartchild and against Glickauf et al.

1Opinion of the CourtBlodgett, J.

In these cases, which, by agreement of the parties, were tried upon the same proofs, complainant seeks an injunction and decree for an accounting by reason of the alleged infringement of reissued letters patent No. 9,467 granted November 16, 1880, to complainant “a roller-abstractor for watches,” the original patent having been granted April 10,1877, and the application for reissue having been filed December 5, 1879. The patentee states the object of his invention is to provide an instrument by the use of which the roller can be easily removed from the balanoe-w'heel of a watch, and which can…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hardwick v. MaslandU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API