Legal Opinion
In Re Stimac
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided March 29, 2007No. 19-21570PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON TRUSTEE’S OBJECTIONS TO CONFIRMATION
SUSAN V. KELLEY, Bankruptcy Judge.
The chapter 13 trustee filed objections to confirmation of the Chapter 13 plans in these cases which were commenced in 2006 and are governed by the provisions of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA). The trustee contends that the Stimacs and Mr. Fruik (collectively the “Debtors”), whose income is above the applicable Wisconsin median income, have not devoted all of their projected disposable income to the plans, as required by 11 U.S.C. §§ 1325(b)(1),…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Baxter, Barnee v. Johnson (In Re Johnson)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2006
- In Re LaPlanaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2007
- In Re CarltonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2007
- In Re LawsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2007
- In Re BalcerowskiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re SpragginsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2008
- In Re KearneyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2010
- In Re BernardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- In Re WoodruffUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- In Re: Donald B. KingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026