Legal Opinion
Dairyland Insurance v. Kelley
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 4, 1986No. 72533PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McMurray, Presiding Judge.
The unpredictable flow of cases stemming from the holdings in Jones v. State Farm &c. Ins. Co., 156 Ga. App. 230 (274 SE2d 623), and Flewellen v. Atlanta Cas. Co., 250 Ga. 709 (300 SE2d 673), prompted Dairyland Insurance Company (“Dairyland”) to file a de*231claratory judgment action against its insured, Margie S. Kelley, to determine its liability for optional personal injury protection (PIP) benefits under Georgia “no-fault” law, OCGA § 33-34-1 et seq. After discovery, Dairyland filed its motion for summary judgment and Mrs. Kelley filed her motion for partial summary…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Flewellen v. Atlanta Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Jones v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. NixonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Government Employees Insurance v. MooneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Douglas v. Jefferson-Pilot Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Silver v. SlusherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Silver v. SlusherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989