Legal Opinion

State v. Cain

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 28, 2000No. 140, Sept. Term, 1999PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

This case appears to present a cutting-edge issue, because it involves a prosecution for theft by means of a deception across state lines perpetrated partly via the Internet. But in reality, the case turns on principles developed by common-law courts long ago, in connection with business done by mail. The question presented in this case is whether a Maryland trial court has territorial jurisdiction over a prosecution for theft by deception in violation of Maryland Code (1957, 1996 Repl.Vol., 1999 Supp.) Art. 27, § 342, 1 where the application for the statement of charges states…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. State v. WincklerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Simmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  4. Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Bowen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Khalifa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. West v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. State v. SimionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  4. Fontaine v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Allen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API