Legal Opinion

Jurgens v. Ram Leather Care

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 1985No. WD 35121PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SHANGLER, Judge.

The action commenced as a pro se petition in the small claims court by Jurgens against former employer Ram Leather Care for $500 unpaid wages and vacation pay. The defendant Ram Leather responded with a counterclaim in excess of the small claims court jurisdiction [§ 478.225, RSMo Supp.1984] and was certified by that tribunal to the circuit court [Rule 145.06]. The presiding judge of the circuit court assigned the case to Associate Circuit Judge Stitt, in lieu of a circuit judge. The plaintiff then engaged counsel and amended her petition to enlarge the claim, and applied for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Tax Commission v. Administrative Hearing CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. Lambert v. FlynnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  3. United Cemeteries Co. v. StrotherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  4. Sisk v. MolinaroSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  5. City of Kansas City v. RuleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Three Bears Camp & Camping, Inc. v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API