Legal Opinion

Parker v. Gladden

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1967PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The petitioner seeks post-conviction relief. He was convicted of second-degree murder in 1961 and his conviction was affirmed upon appeal by this court. In his petition for post-conviction relief he alleges misconduct upon the part of the jury and bailiff. A hear ing was had and the post-eonviction trial court found misconduct, that such misconduct was prejudicial, and ordered a new trial. The warden appeals.

The post-conviction statute (OES 138.550(2)) provides :

“When the petitioner sought and obtained direct appellate review of his conviction and sentence, no ground for relief may be…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Turner v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Parker v. GladdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Watkins v. AckleyOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
  4. Patrick James JEFFRIES, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Tana WOOD, Superintendent, Respondent-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States ex rel. DeLucia v. McMannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API