Parker v. Gladden
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.
The petitioner seeks post-conviction relief. He was convicted of second-degree murder in 1961 and his conviction was affirmed upon appeal by this court. In his petition for post-conviction relief he alleges misconduct upon the part of the jury and bailiff. A hear ing was had and the post-eonviction trial court found misconduct, that such misconduct was prejudicial, and ordered a new trial. The warden appeals.
The post-conviction statute (OES 138.550(2)) provides :
“When the petitioner sought and obtained direct appellate review of his conviction and sentence, no ground for relief may be…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Turner v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Parker v. GladdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Watkins v. AckleyOregon Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
- Patrick James JEFFRIES, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Tana WOOD, Superintendent, Respondent-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States ex rel. DeLucia v. McMannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.