Legal Opinion

Napier v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 8, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Revers-

The appellant, having been convicted of the offense of malicious shooting and wounding and sentenced to two years in the penitentiary, brings this appeal from the judgment.

His first ground for reversal is that the verdict is flagrantly against the evidence. There were but four witnesses who testified about the facts of the shooting. Two of these, Billie Noble, the victim of the shooting, and his wife, Bertha Noble, testified for the Commonwealth. If their testimony is to be believed, the shooting was without excuse. The other two witnesses, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Deaton, Haddix and White v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  2. Winchester v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goff v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. Little v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  3. McHargue v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Napier v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API