Legal Opinion

State Of Washington v. Stacy Ann Bradshaw

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 9, 2018No. 75853-5PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MED COURT OF APPEALS OW I STATE OF WASHINGTON 2018 APR -9 AM 8:38 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) No. 75853-5-1 Respondent, ) ) DIVISION ONE v. ) ) STACY ANN BRADSHAW, ) PUBLISHED OPINION , ) Appellant. ) FILED: April 9, 2018 ) BECKER, J. — To support a charge under the current forgery statute, the State must prove that the allegedly altered written instrument had "legal efficacy." Here, an escrow agent was convicted of forgery for altering a certificate of ' insurance to make it appear she had enough liability insurance to cover a ! transaction she…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. MarkWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Matter of Personal Restraint of SietzWashington Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. Anthony J. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  2. State of Washington v. Adam Shaun JenningsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API