Nickolan-Barron v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We hold that appellant’s facsimile transaction report, which indicates that appellant’s fax, i.e., her notice of appeal, was successfully transmitted to the Office of Appeals at the Agency for Workforce Innovation within the applicable time frame, constituted sufficient evidence that appellant timely faxed her notice of appeal. See Reynolds v. SV Cent. Dania Props., Inc., 849 So.2d 1181, 1182-83 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Espanioly v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 768 So.2d 1230, 1230 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); cf. Mendelsohn v. *595Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 851 So.2d 208, 209 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Reynolds v. SV CENTRAL DANIA PROPERTIESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Espanioly v. Florida Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Mendelsohn v. FL. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gold Coast Eagle Distributing, Inc. v. Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003