512 East 11th Street HDFC v. Grimmet

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order entered August 23, 1989 reversed, with $10 costs, respondent’s motion to dismiss denied.

*972Civil Court granted respondent’s motion to dismiss this holdover summary proceeding on the ground that respondent is a rent-stabilized tenant and that the petition, alleging exemption from rent regulation, fails to set forth the reasons for the eviction as required by the Rent Stabilization Law. However, the papers submitted on this motion conclusively demonstrate that petitioner, presently and at all times since respondent assumed occupancy, is a not-for-profit housing…