Legal Opinion
Talbert v. Talbert
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 12, 1960PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMichael E. Sweeney, J.
This is a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. It is the contention of the defendant that the .complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
I am limited here to considering only the allegations of the complaint. The plaintiff is entitled to the benefit of every • favorable inference one may draw. It must be assumed that all the allegations coni ained in the complaint are true. (Denihan Enterprises v. O’Dwyer, 302 N. Y. 451.)
If the defendant is to be successful it must be determined as a matter of law that admitting…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Wagner v. International Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Eckert v. . the Long Island Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Denihan Enterprises, Inc. v. O'DwyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Gibney v. . StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Provenzo v. SamNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Dubus v. Dresser IndustriesWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
- Guarino v. Mine Safety Appliance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Strickland v. KoteckiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- Trott v. Dean Witter & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.